【移交逃犯】8專業團體都遊行 法政匯思斥修例褫奪立會監管權

8個專業團體學術,包括自由學者聯盟、放射良心、進步教師同盟、法政匯思、保險起動、思言財雋、社工復興和民主進步會計師,今日都有參與民陣的遊行,反對港府修訂《逃犯條例》。法政匯思召集人李安然表示,新修訂的法例將會褫奪立法會的監管權,證明政府所說的「保障只會更多、不會更小」的說法並不正確。此外,雖然李家超經常說法庭會把關,但法庭只會審視外地提交的證據,是否構成表面證據,只要構成,法庭就會同意引渡,顯示這個把關作用根本不足。

【法政巴絲】修例送「中」 夾你返大陸呀嗱!

3月將完4月將至,又到咗約friends去旅行嘅季節,筆者本來都約咗幾個朋友去泰國旅行,check晒機票酒店諗住畀錢啦,點知有日返返吓工就見到個WhatsApp group係咁有notifications,原來係我兩個朋友喺WhatsApp度無端端隔空為咗國民身份認同對罵,鬧到旅行都去唔成。

Former Hong Kong minister Patrick Ho appeals against US conviction in multimillion-dollar bribery case

Disgraced former Hong Kong minister Patrick Ho Chi-ping has appealed against his conviction in the US over a multimillion-dollar bribery case. Jason Ng, a US lawyer and convenor of Hong Kong’s Progressive Lawyers Group, said that for Ho to successfully appeal he would either have to present new evidence or witnesses, challenge the evidence from the prosecutors’ side or argue that the judge wrongly interpreted legal principles.

Decline and fall? Progressive Lawyers Group plans new barometer to measure Hong Kong’s rule of law

Written in 2019, a report on Hong Kong’s rule of law may make for uncomfortable reading – but to the authors, it is also a reminder that there is much work to be done. Next month the Progressive Lawyers Group (PLG) will launch what it hopes will be an annual tradition: a record of major events affecting Hong Kong’s rule of law, paired with its own legal analysis and recommendations.

李安然談《逃犯條例》

法政匯思召集人李安然出席Now新聞台節目【時事全方位】,討論各界對修改《逃犯條例》疑慮。

法政匯思就國歌條例草案(「該草案」)的發言摘要 (Progressive Lawyers Group’s Speaking Note on the National Anthem Bill)

法政匯思看不見將「不當使用」國歌或「侮辱」國歌的行為刑事化能夠為社會帶來多大的實際效益,以為政府對人民的憲制權利 ── 包括對言論自由的侵害 ── 提供充份的正當理由。即使我們假設將與國歌相關的行為刑事化而對憲制權利衍生的限制有其正當性,這種限制應該是狹窄而被清晰定義的。然而,現時該草案非常粗疏且模糊不清;尤其是該草案的第 6 和第 7 條更無法符合「依法規定」的原則。(As a starting point, we see no material societal benefit or need in criminalising conduct involving the “misuse” of the national anthem or the “insult” of the national anthem, which justifies such encroachment on the constitutional rights of the individual, including the freedom of expression. Even assuming the restriction of constitutional rights by criminalising conduct involving the national anthem is justified, the boundary of such restriction should be narrowly drawn and clearly defined. However, the Bill in its current form is poorly drafted and appallingly lacking in clarity. In particular, the offence creating sections (Clauses 6 and 7) regrettably fall foul of the “prescribed by law” requirement.)

Submission on National Anthem Bill Progressive Lawyers Group  

In March 2019, the Progressive Lawyers Group presented its submissions on the National Anthem Bill gazetted by the Hong Kong Government on 11 January 2019. 

Jason Y. Ng Attended RTHK Interview on Extradition Laws

Progressive Lawyers Group Convenor Jason Y. Ng attended radio programme Backchat today to discuss, among other things, the Government’s plan to amend the extradition laws which will allow Hong Kong to hand over fugitives to mainland China.

Jason Y. Ng on Hong Kong’s Extradition Proposal

Move over, national anthem law. Make room, anti-subversion bill. Here comes the government’s latest legislative menace: a fundamental policy shift in fugitive transfers between Hong Kong and mainland China. This time, the threat to personal security is bigger, more real, and has the potential to affect a broader range of people than any other government bill we’ve seen in recent years.