【法政匯思就人大常委會關於「一地兩檢」決定的聲明】
(Please scroll down for English)

就全國人民代表大會常務委員會於2017年12月27日通過「一地兩檢」合作安排的決定(「該決定」),法政匯思有以下回應:

1. 該決定實際上反映香港及中國政府不惜代價以不受制約的權力曲解基本法、破壞「一國兩制」,就此法政匯思表示極度遺憾和憤慨。

2. 法政匯思早在 2017 年9月18日已就一地兩檢提議發表我們的意見(詳見《有關高速鐵路香港段一地兩檢安排的陳述書》:https://goo.gl/pyLgNX)。該決定雖然引述了某些《基本法》條文,但皆為普遍性的條款,不可能提供法律基礎於任何香港地域以大陸法律取代《基本法》及香港法律。我們於以上意見批評一地兩檢安排為以法令統治的結論仍然成立。我們認為香港法律界有責任及時、而不是待事件發展至幾乎無法挽回時,才就重要的法律議題發表遲來的意見。

3. 法政匯思留意到不少法律界人士、學者及團體(包括大律師公會),已經就該決定批准的一地兩檢安排欠缺法理依據一事作出評論。我們呼籲香港及中國政府懸崖勒馬,勿讓該決定成為破壞一國兩制上的最後一根稻草。

法政匯思
2017年12月29日

 

Statement of the Progressive Lawyers Group on the Decision of NPCSC on the “Co-Location” Arrangement

The Progressive Lawyers Group (“PLG”) responds as follows in relation to the decision made by the NPCSC on the “Co-Location” Arrangement on 27 December 2017 (“Decision”):

1. The PLG is in deep regret and outrage that the Decision reflects that the Hong Kong and Chinese Government have resorted to unlimited and unrestrained powers to twist the Basic Law at all costs. “One Country, Two Systems” is irreparably damaged.

2. As early as on 18 September 2017, the PLG had already issued our Submission on the Co-Location Arrangement (“Earlier Submission”) (available at: https://goo.gl/pyLgNX). Although the NPCSC referred to certain Articles of the Basic Law in its Decision, we note that these Articles are general and cannot provide any legal basis to support the application of PRC laws in any Hong Kong territory in replacement of the application of the Basic Law and Hong Kong laws. We stand by our conclusion in our Earlier Submission that the Co-Location Arrangement represents a rule by decree in Hong Kong. We believe that the legal profession in Hong Kong has the responsibility to provide its opinion to the public on important legal issues in Hong Kong in a timely fashion and not to idle until when the affairs have progressed to an irreversible state.

3. The PLG notes that various members of the legal profession, academics and groups (including the Hong Kong Bar Association) have recently proffered their opinion on the lack of legality of the Co-Location Arrangement. We hereby appeal to the Hong Kong and Chinese Government to exercise self-restraint and to stop before it is too late, such that the Decision will not become the last straw in the damage to “One Country, Two Systems”.

The Progressive Lawyers Group
29 December 2017

26195534_977509139082625_6004765326790705029_n26166636_977509359082603_5893412376857215258_n