【法政匯絲】我們的普世價值

我很喜歡看旅遊節目,當然不是那些只是不斷地話「啲嘢好好味呀,口感好好啊」,或喺邊度影selfie好呀嘅節目,而係一啲真係睇完會對呢個世界多了認識,會介紹當地人生活嘅旅遊節目。

【法政匯絲】就算失望 不能絕望

一早回到辦公室,茶水間鬧哄哄的,大家都看着報紙的頭版。是誰又派花生,讓這裏洋溢着快樂的空氣?

China Is Rapidly Squandering the Unique Opportunity That Hong Kong Represents

It is normally difficult to get lawyers to stop talking and stay quiet. But that is exactly what happened last Tuesday, when 2,000 of them, all dressed in black, marched through the center of Hong Kong in a dignified “silent protest” against a move by the Chinese government to directly intervene in the city’s legal affairs.

【法政匯絲】法律知識 VS 喪屍式絕望

這幾年多了很多喪屍片,例如早排勁hit的韓國喪屍災難片《屍殺列車》和幾個星期前開始新一季的 Walking Dead 《陰屍路》。曾經有學者說喪屍片的流行與時代變遷如經濟蕭條、戰爭、疫情等有直接的關係,反影社會的無力感。我十分同意這個理論。喪屍開始的時候只會有一、兩群,不過很快就會以倍數增長,好像恐怖主義、流行病毒以至民粹主義的復興每一處也有它們的蹤影。當人們看到螢光幕上的英雄解決喪屍們時,也會墮入角色幻想自己有能力解決現實社會的問題。

Hong Kong Lawyers Protest Beijing’s Overreach

The Progressive Lawyers Group says the ruling has gone well beyond an interpretation of the Basic Law as it effectively prescribes matters within the remit of Hong Kong domestic law, which is a power not accorded to Beijing under the existing Basic Law framework of Hong Kong.

人大釋法 FAQs (FAQs regarding the Interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on 7 November 2016)

What are the NPCSC’s powers of interpretation of the Basic Law? Article 67(4) of the PRC Constitution and Article 158(1) of the Basic Law gives NPCSC has a freestanding and plenary power of interpretation of the Basic Law. This was also confirmed in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal case of Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration (1999) 2 HKCFAR 300. However, this power should be sparingly used. Both the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Law Society of Hong Kong have in the past consistently called on the NPCSC to use this power with great restraint, as this would give rise to concerns about the rule of law and judicial independence.

法政匯思意見書:強烈譴責人大釋法 為政治目的濫用解釋權 (Submissions in relation to the Interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on 7 November 2016)

On 7 November 2016, the Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress (“NPCSC”), in purported exercise of its powers under Article 158 of the Basic Law, issued an interpretation in relation to Article 104 of the Basic Law (“the Interpretation”).  2. This is the fifth time the NPCSC has interpreted the Basic Law. In summary, and as further explained below, the Progressive Lawyers Group’s submissions on the Interpretation are set out in this statement.

【法政匯絲】我們不會坐低

其實原本呢,小妹子呢排心情算靚:首先,自己畀大狀界小鮮肉(不是林人乍ok?Urghhh...Yuck)讚我可愛cutie,之後絲打Bella同我講,決定放棄紅資上市工作,轉做人權律師,再者絲打Stephanie Matias又啱啱訂咗婚,你話唔開心跳起yeah先奇啦。 所以諗住星期三返到公司繼續發吓甜夢,J吓lengjai,點知……what a day……!

This week, Beijing is putting Hong Kong’s judicial independence on the line

(Quartz) As the Hong Kong government takes to the courts to challenge the right of two pro-independence politicians to swear in as lawmakers in the city’s legislature, many are looking to the judiciary as the last line of defense against Beijing’s growing encroachment on Hong Kong’s autonomy.